Discover more from Tom’s Newsletter
A Letter to My Family and Friends
the biofascist threat to humanity
Dear Family and Friends,
I know many of you have taken the Covid-19 vaccines. I do not wish to alarm you, yet my conscience compels me to share with you concerns about the vaccines that have been voiced by prominent scientists and doctors as well as by journalists and researchers.
I am aware that some of the figures included in what I am sending have been criticized in the corporate media. Suffice it to say that, whatever the merit of those criticisms, what these accomplished professionals have to say remains urgent in the extreme, and vital to an informed assessment of the crises we face medically, politically, economically, and culturally.
At the outset, it will help to review a credible estimate of the infection fatality rates, by age, of the SARS-CoV-2 virus:[i]
70+: 2.4% (non-institutional)
The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) estimates the overall chances of dying from SARS-CoV-2 infection at 3 in 1000,[ii] with an individual’s risk being particularly influenced by age and comorbidities, especially obesity and diabetes. Meanwhile, the chances of being hospitalized for Covid-19 following infection with SARS-CoV-2, whether vaccinated or unvaccinated, are <1%.[iii]
Covid-19 Vaccines’ failures and dangers
A wealth of data and critical analyses indicate that the currently available Covid-19 vaccines are dangerous, scarcely effective beyond ~6 months, and that they were never as effective as advertised.
Even their manufacturers’ initial studies of the vaccines found that their “absolute risk reduction” (ARR) was between <2% to <1%,[iv] although only the “relative risk reduction” (RRR) of ~95% was widely reported. ARR indicates the amount of overall or “absolute” protection conferred by vaccination, since it accounts for the broader population of test subjects, being derived by comparing the numbers of those who did not become infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus in both the control and experimental groups; in other words, only <2% to <1% more of the unvaccinated cohort contracted the virus in comparison with the vaccinated cohort, an indication of the slight degree of real-world protection conferred by the vaccines. Conversely, RRR compares the numbers of those in the control and experimental groups who did contract the virus; around twice as many of the unvaccinated as compared to the vaccinated, though these numbers (it follows) were a small fraction of the overall subjects in each of the manufacturers’ studies.
The statistical significance of these findings is debatable, especially in light of The BMJ’s investigation finding (as Maryanne Demasi, PhD, reports) “that a company called Ventavia, tasked with running a trial site for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine study, ‘falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events.’”[v]
Meanwhile, as the presentations under “essential viewing” (below) indicate, even the slim degree of protection claimed for the vaccines now appears to largely dissipate over ~6 months,[vi] a fact the manufactures are likely to have known, considering they terminated their vaccine trials at a few months’ duration[vii]—in order, one suspects, to conceal their products’ declining efficacy, as evidence indicates that vaccine efficacy begins declining as soon as two months following injection.[viii] A recent paper contends that while protection against severe disease persists in some populations at 9 months following vaccination, this is not true for men, the frail elderly, and those with comorbidities, for whom protection dissipates from 4 to 7 months[ix] following vaccination, “with a number of subgroups even showing negative efficacy against severe outcomes,”[x] an indication that the vaccines may be harming rather than protecting groups most vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 (an outcome addressed further below).
Meanwhile, contrary to the expectations of many, the global mass vaccination campaign has failed to impact the trajectory of the Covid-19 pandemic both domestically and abroad. A recent study of 68 countries and 2947 US counties found that the Covid-19 mass vaccination program had no discernible effect on infection rate[xi] and that regions with higher vaccination rates also had higher rates of virus transmission, refuting “the narrative” that “the ongoing surge of new cases in the United States” is “driven by areas with low vaccination rates.” According with these findings is a report that San Diego, CA recently saw more SARS-CoV-2 infections among the vaccinated than among the unvaccinated,[xii] while a UK government report indicates that among those over 30 the vaccinated are more likely than the unvaccinated to become infected[xiii] with SARS-CoV-2. Ireland, meanwhile, with a 91% vaccination rate, is seeing its highest rates of hospitalization since March.[xiv] Additionally, while recently 70% of Covid-19 hospitalizations in Belgium were fully vaccinated, that number is now 100% in Ghent[xv] (see both references in endnote).
Meanwhile, the CDC reports on its website that as of Oct. 12 there have been 31,895 hospitalizations and deaths (24,717 hospitalizations; 7,178 deaths) among breakthrough cases in the US.[xvi] In light of this news, Dr. Peter McCullough, who has authored or coauthored over 600 professional peer-reviewed papers, including some 50 on Covid-19 (McCullough is a foremost authority on early treatment of the disease), states that the “vaccines as they exist today cannot be claimed to protect against hospitalization and death” from Covid-19. He adds, “We’re starting to see wholesale failure of the vaccines.”[xvii] It should be noted that, based on the vaccine manufacturers’ own clinical trial data, this result was foreseeable, as these data indicate that the vaccines cause more harm than good when analyzed using the “proper scientific endpoint” of “all cause severe morbidity.”[xviii]
In light of their failure to curb infection and the emerging evidence that they are also increasingly failing to protect against severe disease and death, key facts about these vaccines bear recalling. Including that they are experimental and completely long-term untested, while deploying a technology (mRNA) qualitatively distinguishing them from prior vaccines, a technology which until recent changes to the CDC definition of “vaccine”[xix] technically qualified the Covid-19 vaccines as gene therapies.[xx] Additionally, the manufacturers of these injections (arguably, another more accurate term for the Covid-19 gene therapies than “vaccines”) remain as of this writing completely indemnified against any harms they may cause, while those consenting to receive the injections—reportedly over 70% of adults in the US—assume all of the risk.
That risk, it turns out, appears considerable—if scarcely studied, due to “regulatory capture” of government agencies by the corporations these agencies are charged with regulating.[xxi] Of note here is a report that 75% of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) funding comes from the biopharmaceutical industry the agency ostensibly oversees.[xxii]
As is clarified in “essential viewing,” distinguished members of the medical community are aware of alarming signals in patient data that indicate the following: the Covid-19 injections interfere at the genetic level with the body’s natural or “innate” immune system[xxiii] (see also[xxiv]), which the injections are designed to circumvent in a manner now appearing to significantly weaken or damage innate immunity,[xxv] rendering those injected more susceptible to pathologies including aggressive cancers such as lymphomas, while also causing damage to organ tissues throughout the body due to the failure of the injection-induced spike proteins to remain localized in the area of injection; in what is, shockingly, the only study of its kind so far, an autopsy of a vaccinated individual revealed that these dangerous spike proteins, which the injections “teach” the injectee’s cells to produce, were found in every major organ of the deceased’s body,[xxvi] a discovery with potentially dire ramifications, and which flies in the face of assurances by health officials that this would not happen.
The malfeasance exposed by the materials I am sending is staggering. Its consequences are characterized by McCullough in his recalling a statement made to him by a former president of the American Medical Association regarding the current SARS-CoV-2 mass vaccination campaign: “We have the biggest biological catastrophe on our hands in human history with a medicinal product, and we’ve had two administrations buy into it. We’ve had […] all the houses of legislation buy into it, we had the entire medical establishment buy into it, and the whole media, and no one knows how to stop it. No one knows how to stop this freight train.”[xxvii]
The dangers of the mass injection program have been known for some time. For example, in a June 9, 2021 preliminary report from the UK’s Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd., the principle advisory group for the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr. Tess Lawrie concluded of the Covid-19 vaccines that “It is now apparent that these products in the blood streams are toxic to humans. An immediate halt to the vaccination programme is required whilst a full and independent safety analysis is undertaken to investigate the full extent of the harms, which the UK Yellow Card data suggest include thromboembolism, multisystem inflammatory disease, immune suppression, autoimmunity and anaphylaxis, as well as Antibody Dependent Enhancement”[xxviii] (ADE is discussed below).
In the US, meanwhile, the dangers of the vaccines have been known about for more than a year, as indicated by “Plans for Monitoring COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness,” an October 22, 2020 presentation to the Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) by Steve Anderson, PhD/MMP, director of the Office of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER); “Slide 16” of that presentation adduces a host of adverse reactions to vaccine,[xxix] including stroke, myocarditis/pericarditis, autoimmune disease, anaphylaxis, and death, among numerous other afflictions. To these indications of the vaccines’ dangers should be added a January 2021 paper documenting that the Pfizer vaccine causes neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s and other conditions.[xxx]
According to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, or VAERS, as of Oct. 29 adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections include some 18,078 deaths,[xxxi] more deaths than have been attributed to all other vaccines combined (VAERS also reports 856,917 overall adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections, 88,910 of which resulted in hospitalization). While the reliability of VAERS data in the context of Covid-19 has been treated dismissively by public health officials, a study found that 86% of the deaths reported to VAERS in the context of the Covid-19 injections were directly relatable to those injections, with the other 14% remaining unclear.[xxxii] VAERS estimates, it should be noted, are likely to drastically understate the actual numbers of adverse events to the injections, by a factor of between 10 to 100[xxxiii] (based on a confluence of data streams relevant to the vaccination campaign, a team of data analysts hired by philanthropist Steve Kirsch puts this factor at >41[xxxiv]). McCullough asserts that referring to adverse reactions as “rare” is misleading, in that reports of them are known to more accurately reflect, in his words, “the tip of the iceberg.”[xxxv]
It is notable in this context that one is only counted as “fully vaccinated” at two weeks following (last) injection.[xxxvi] This, even as McCullough reports that half of reported deaths from adverse reactions occur within 48 hours, with 80% occurring within a week. Meanwhile, evidence indicates that the injections diminish immunity during these first two weeks.[xxxvii] The apparent reason the injected are not considered fully vaccinated until after this initial period of injection-induced vulnerability is to enhance the impression of the injections’ efficacy.
Again, VAERS reflects only the adverse reactions that are known about so far. As VAERS numbers mount, there is, tragically, reason to anticipate still worse future reactions to the Covid-19 injections.
A board certified physician in 9 states who heads Idaho’s largest medical laboratory and who has served as chief fellow at both the Mayo Clinic and Columbia School of Medicine, pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole reports that he and other doctors are already seeing signals of serious pathogenic responses to the Covid-19 injections.[xxxviii] Cole states that “Since January 1st, in the laboratory, I am seeing a 20 times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis.”[xxxix] He finds this especially concerning, since such signals would usually be expected to emerge only within 3 to 5 years or more, while they are emerging in response to the Covid-19 injections as early as 6 weeks from administration (see endnote xxv).
The warnings issued by McCullough and Cole accord disturbingly with several reports of excess mortalities in regions with high Covid-19 vaccination rates, including Scotland[xl] and Germany[xli] among other places.[xlii] In Taiwan[xliii] reports indicate that in early October deaths from vaccination exceeded deaths from Covid-19. A report from Vermont[xliv] indicates that in September 76% of Covid-19 deaths were breakthrough cases (that is, they occurred among the vaccinated). This echoes data from the UK, where >70% of those who die from Covid-19 are fully vaccinated[xlv] and where among those over >50 years old the vaccinated are significantly more likely to contract Covid-19 disease than the unvaccinated.[xlvi] Accordingly, reports over the past month from Israel, whose mass vaccination program (like the UK’s) precedes the US’s by several weeks, indicate that the vaccine is currently failing to protect not only against infection but, increasingly, against severe disease and death as well.[xlvii]
Additionally, a recent UK government report indicates that the Covid-19 injections appear to prevent the vaccinated from ever acquiring full immunity to the virus even if one becomes infected and recovers,[xlviii] while infection and recovery among the unvaccinated almost always confers full immunity (see endnote lxxii). That the injections could worsen rather than strengthen immunity against Covid-19 has been known since at least the spring; a study published in March found that recipients of the injections should have been warned of this possibility.[xlix]
Again, indications are emerging that the greatest threat the injections pose is to those they are most supposed to helped. A September 2021 paper found that the injections dramatically increase the risk of death for the most vulnerable age-group. According to the paper,[l] “A novel best-case scenario [emphasis original] cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively [emphasis original] that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially” (bold/underline added). Among the paper’s concluding observations are that “the spike protein and the surrounding LNP [lipid nanoparticles] are toxins with the potential to cause myriad short-, mid-, and long-term adverse health effects even in the absence of other contributing factors! Where and when these effects occur will depend on the biodistribution of the injected material. Pfizer’s own biodistribution studies have shown the injected material can be found in myriad critical organs throughout the body, leading to the possibility of multi-organ failure. And these studies were from a single injection. Multiple injections and booster shots may have cumulative effects on organ distributions of inoculant!” (bold/underline added).
To summarize, the Covid-19 injections dramatically wane in efficacy against infection,[li] disease (which they may worsen in the longer term), and death (the risk of which they may increase), while potentially weakening immune response to COVID disease and other illnesses, and this in the context of reports from various regions of increases in overall mortality that correlate with the onset of mass vaccination. To all this could be added emerging reports of increases in hospitalizations that are not obviously Covid-19 related.[lii]
In the US, a recent report from Humetrix,[liii] a Department of Defense (DoD) artificial intelligence asset which has been monitoring the pandemic via the CMS (Medicare/Medicaid) database (nearly 1/5th of the entire US population), echoes the troubling findings from Israel, the UK, and other regions. Humetrix indicates not only that vaccine efficacy against infection and severe disease wanes after 6 months, but that the overall immunity of the vaccinated appears to suffer over that period in contrast to the unvaccinated. Humetrix reports that 60% of those hospitalized with Covid-19 were fully vaccinated, and that the vaccinated had a 2.5x higher odds of being infected and hospitalized over time than the unvaccinated. The Humetrix report also indicates markedly worse vaccination outcomes for First Nations Peoples (“Native Americans”) and Hispanics. Since being publicized in alternative media the Humetrix report has been removed from the company’s website, although copies of it are available on the web (see prior link/endnote; I saw the report when it was still available on Humetrix.com).
We have yet to consider what may be the grimmest threat posed by the Covid-19 mass vaccination campaign. It is voiced by prominent vaccinologist Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche and echoed by Dr. Robert Malone, who is credited with the conceptual breakthrough that led to mRNA technology.[liv] Vanden Bossche warns unequivocally that mass-vaccinating during a pandemic is, from the perspective of standard epidemiology, madness, as doing so is sure to drive, through a process known as “antibody dependent enhancement” (ADE),[lv] the evolution of vaccine-resistant strains of the virus, as appears to have happened with the vaccine-resistant delta,[lvi] lambda,[lvii] and A.3[lviii] SARS-CoV-2 variants. While delta is, likely due to mass vaccination-driven ADE, by far the most prevalent variant in the US presently, the booster currently being mandated is not designed for that variant, but for the original alpha (or Wuhan) variant; even the CDC spokesperson has admitted that the government has “no data” indicating the booster will work, only “hope” that it will.[lix]
According to Vanden Bossche and Malone (among others), we risk creating through ADE a mass dependency upon perpetual vaccination for the survival of our species, which in turn runs the risk of “immune exhaustion,” overtaxing the immune system through repeated vaccine-stimulation to the point at which it becomes unresponsive. Attending these risks is the creation of a human-immune monoculture rendering us susceptible to extinction upon the emergence of a single viral variant rendered apocalyptically virulent by ADE. Such an outcome is precedented in the history of mass-vaccinating a species: Mareck’s disease in poultry,[lx] which formerly killed relatively few chickens, now kills, due to mass vaccination-driven ADE, all chickens not immunized against it.
Vanden Bossche and Malone insist that the perils of mass vaccination are all too real, and increase with every day the Covid-19 mass vaccination campaign is sustained, as that campaign not only heightens the likelihood of creating more infectious strains of the virus, but deadlier strains as well. Speaking of the Israeli context, Vanden Bossche writes that “it is reasonable to expect booster injections to only enable the virus to more rapidly evolve resistance to the vaccines. The evolution would be dramatically expedited by vaccinating and boosting more and more younger age groups” (emphasis original),[lxi] an observation with relevance to the US context, considering the FDA’s granting of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Covid-19 injections for children 5-11 years old. Since spring, Vanden Bossche has been calling for an immediate cessation of the global vaccination campaign.
In an interview recorded three weeks ago, Malone states that while the injections do still appear to provide some protection against severe COVID disease in the UK, the rate of fatalities among the vaccinated is higher for other maladies when compared against fatality rates among the unvaccinated,[lxii] further bolstering the hypothesis that the vaccine weakens overall natural immunity.
It bears noting in all this that, as Malone points out, the US Health and Human Services “actively lies” as a matter of “federal policy” “about vaccine safety and efficacy.”[lxiii] Malone adds that “The whole system is corrupt.”
Recognition of the dangers posed by these injections is dawning in parts of the world, Scandinavia in particular: Iceland has banned the Moderna injection for all ages, while Finland and Sweden have banned it for those under 30; Norway urges those under 30 to use Pfizer,[lxiv] while Denmark has banned Moderna for those under 18. Additionally, Sweden has extended indefinitely a moratorium on Moderna for anyone under 30[lxv] in the wake of that injection’s leading to crippling heart conditions. More recently, France and Germany now advise against anyone under 30 receiving Moderna.[lxvi]
In the US, meanwhile, three recent high-profile resignations, two from FDA[lxvii] and one from NIH,[lxviii] suggest that awareness of the dangers of these injections has reached the highest echelons of our national health bureaucracy. It is notable that, following more than 8 hours of public hearings on the matter, the FDA voted to reject the booster program by a striking majority of 16-2,[lxix] only to be overruled by an administration in obvious thrall to Big Pharma (an patent case of politics trumping science). It should be noted that even the term “booster” is misleading, in that it normally suggests the administration of a lesser amount of inoculant, while the Covid-19 “boosters” comprise (with the possible exception of Moderna) another full dose of the original injection.
As indicated, a wealth of credible sources thoroughly debunk the following widely believed aspects of the US government’s Covid-19 mass vaccination propaganda campaign, including:
—that vaccines are the only effective treatment, and relatedly
McCullough maintains that the death rate of the pandemic could have been drastically reduced using inexpensive early treatment protocols that have all but eliminated Covid-19 in Uttar Pradesh[lxxiii] (India’s most populace province, with over 200 million people, and only a <6% vaccination rate), and that have brought the pandemic under control in Mexico City and Ecuador, among other places with relatively low vaccination rates.
According to McCullough, the way to manage the Covid-19 pandemic now is through early treatment protocols that have been actively discouraged if not outright banned in the US due to pressure from Big Pharma. According to Elizabeth Lee Vliet MD, “The travesty of orchestrated suppression of lifesaving medicines to treat COVID-19 has resulted in the societal murder of over two million people globally. […] This massive death toll has been horrific in the U.S., United Kingdom, Western Europe, Canada, and Australia where physicians are still largely prevented [emphasis original] from access to lifesaving medicines and threatened with loss of license or persecution if they go against bureaucratic and political suppression of early home-based treatment” (bold/underline added) (p. xxiii, COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey, Peter R. Breggin MD & Ginger Ross Breggin) (see also[lxxiv]).
Early treatment protocols have been propagandistically maligned[lxxv] (as in deriding Ivermectin[lxxvi] as a “horse de-wormer”[lxxvii]), apparently because if any such treatments against Covid-19 were proven effective then the FDA could not legally grant the vaccines the Emergency Use Authorization under which they are currently being administered.[lxxviii] That is, for an EUA to be legal “there must be no adequate, approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing or treating the disease or condition.” [lxxix]
Vaccine passports: the geopolitical context of Covid-19
This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears above ground he is a protector. —Plato, The Republic, Book XXIX
The foregoing requires contextualizing in what, following Giorgio Agamben, appears to be the geopolitical dimension of the Covid-19 pandemic and global mass vaccination effort.
Based in part on his reading of Patrick Zylberman’s Tempêtes Microbiennes, Agamben, the world’s foremost living theorist of state power, characterizes the Covid-19 pandemic as the pretext for a Western plutocratic reorientation of power away from the nation-state model and the inherent rights of citizens upon which it is based, toward a global “biosecurity state” compared by Agamben to fascism[lxxx] and which, following Benito Mussolini’s original definition of that term as “the perfect marriage of government and corporation,” may be termed biofascism.
As indicated by plutocratic power centers advocating it, “biosecurity” supplants the rights of citizens with privileges based on vaccination as part of a “social credit” system akin to the Chinese/CCP model of social control.[lxxxi] “Biosecurity” thus serves as the pretext for a surveillance tyranny[lxxxii] in which artificial intelligence electronically monitors and regulates our movements, interactions, and monetary exchanges at the behest of an international elite controlling most wealth and property while the masses are subordinated to technologically enforced regimentation of communication, buying and selling, and travel. Biosecurity serves, in other words, to legitimize an “oligarchical communalism” of the sort described in George Orwell’s 1984. Relevant in this context is the recent mass acquisition of farm land by Bill Gates and other billionaire investors[lxxxiii] and of residential property by the powerful investment firm BlackRock,[lxxxiv] a major influence in the Biden White House.
It bears noting that the pandemic has seen trillions of dollars in wealth flow to the elite financial class and away from working people,[lxxxv] exacerbating what was already the most extreme polarization of wealth in modern history.[lxxxvi] Relevant here is The United States’ characterization, in a paper published by Cambridge University, as (in essence) a plutocracy.[lxxxvii] Such scholarly characterization of the US is consonant with Michael J. Glennon’s highly regarded book National Security and Double Government (Oxford, 2015),[lxxxviii] which posits that true power in the nation is exercised behind the scenes via the permanent bureaucracy of the National Security State.
The plutocratic entity spearheading implementation of the biosecurity state is the World Economic Forum (WEF). The WEF (aka “Davos set”) was founded in 1971 (as the European Management Symposium) by its current executive chairman Klaus Schwab, a Malthusian whose slogans on global governance since the pandemic (including “The Great Reset” and “Build Back Better”) have been echoed with telltale precision by “liberal” Western governments including the Biden administration.[lxxxix] The WEF’s intent may be discerned in its propaganda, which includes such reveries as “Welcome to 2030: I own nothing, have no privacy and life has never been better,”[xc] a sentiment echoed by Schwab: “In 2030, you’ll own nothing and be happy about it.”[xci] Not for nothing is it pondered, “Is Klaus Schwab the most dangerous man in the world?”[xcii]
Given the stated aims of the WEF and its current sway over the media and governmental apparatuses of the United States and broader Western world, there is little doubt we are witnessing on a global scale an unprecedentedly radical feat of social engineering, one aim of which is to reduce the US from a republic of free citizens endowed with inalienable rights, to a fiefdom in an unelected global technocracy whose subjects depend for safety and survival upon adherence to authoritarian dictates and restrictions.
A further surmise is relevant here. Considering the Covid-19 vaccines’ failures and dangers, what appears to impel mass vaccination is less a concern for public health than the implementation of a “vaccine passport” system functioning as a new electronic currency replacing cash[xciii] (now presumably a biohazard). Notably, a September 9th UK government report determined the scientific inefficacy of vaccine passports in controlling the Covid-19 pandemic,[xciv] even as 20 other studies raise grave doubts about vaccine mandates.[xcv] That a vaccine passport system is nonetheless still being pursued in the UK and much of the world is a further suggestion that that system is the intended vehicle through which the masters of the emergent global order intend to impose draconian austerity and suppression measures[xcvi] of the sort now implemented in the Covid-19 police-states of Australia (where amid intensive lockdowns officials are refusing to disclose the number of Covid-19 deaths among the vaccinated[xcvii]), New Zealand,[xcviii] Lithuania, and (increasingly) Austria and Germany, models for the repressive plutocratic surveillance tyranny envisioned for our impending future in the US.
My study of the parapolitical (aka deep-politics, concerned with covert state violence and coercion) leads me to concur with Agamben:
We could argue that, once terrorism ceased to exist as a cause for measures of exception [i.e., extra-constitutional measures instituted within a state of emergency], the invention of an epidemic offers the ideal pretext for widening them beyond all known limits.
Secondly, and no less disquietingly, we have to consider the state of precarity and fear that has been in recent years systematically cultivated in people’s minds—a state which has resulted in a natural propensity for mass panic, for which an epidemic offers the ideal pretext. We could say that a massive wave of fear caused by a microscopic parasite is traversing humanity, and that the world’s rulers guide and orient it toward their own ends (from Where Are We Now?: The Epidemic as Politics, 2021, p. 13).
To elaborate, the War on Terror initiated by 9/11 served as the prior pretext for global domination by what has been called the Global American Empire (GAE). That conventional military effort’s strategic potential having been exhausted (as witnessed in the US withdrawal from Afghanistan), the biosecurity state appears as the GAE’s next grand imperial strategy through which it intends to exercise hegemony using what is, in effect, state-sponsored bioterrorism. Which is not to insist that SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon intentionally released by the powers-that-be (though a Machiavellian reading of history must contend with that possibility[xcix]), but to underscore the draconian terms imposed by the emergent global biofascist order on nations desperate for measures to combat SARS-CoV-2[c] and/or desiring to conduct business with the GAE or its subordinates.
Of note are Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s trenchant criticisms of Anthony Fauci (found in “essential viewing” below and documented in Kennedy’s forthcoming book[ci]), including Fauci’s apparent role, along with Bill Gates, as long-time intelligence assets, as evidenced in these men having served as key figures in a series of DoD exercises over the past two decades rehearsing the transformation of the US into a police-state under the guise of a pandemic response.
The domestic scene
I say what follows with particular reluctance.
Until the past year, it had long been my belief that when fascism arrived in the US it would do so from the political right. I was mistaken. The Democratic Party has replaced the Republican as the Party of the GAE, a role the Republican Party fulfilled in the 9/11 era. The effective mass censorship in the US today signals the Democratic Party’s treacherous authoritarianism,[cii] a liberticidal fanaticism masking a desperation to quell criticism and dissent.
In fulfillment of the Buddhist adage “you become what you hate,” many Democrats have embraced an authoritarianism mirroring that of which they accuse Donald Trump and his supporters. As you who know me will appreciate, it grieves me to say this, considering my longtime leftist sympathies. Yet the fact remains: the information contained in this message is censored on major internet and social media platforms due largely to policies instituted in the wake of the Nov. 3, 2020 elections.
The embrace by the left of the GAE Covid-19/vaccine agenda includes for some a passionate determination to censor dissent,[ciii] or to deny the unvaccinated basic rights including shopping at a supermarket,[civ] or even to isolate them from society.[cv] All symptoms of an acute authoritarian psychosis recalling rightwing nationalism post-9/11. The present psychosis is fueled by incessant propagandizing from a corporate media largely funded[cvi] by the biopharmaceutical concerns profiting so massively[cvii] from such pernicious mongering in lies, hatred, and fear.
Given what remains (for now) the public record on the Covid-19 injections, those advocating such draconian measures themselves pose to civil society the malignant threat which they impute so exclusively to their political rivals.
In their avidness to “own” Trump supporters who refuse the vaccine, many on the left hypocritically discount that vaccine mandates discriminate disproportionately against the very populations the left claims so vociferously to care about. Among the most vaccine-hesitant groups in the US are Black and Hispanic populations, [cviii] with the rate of young unvaccinated Blacks in New York City exceeding 70%.[cix] Meanwhile, the most vaccine-hesitant in terms of education level are those with PhDs.[cx]
The Biden administration and state Democrats’ aggressive campaign promoting dangerous and failing injections has led to mass firings across the country, including of some 72,000 healthcare workers[cxi] in New York State alone, most of whom have been barred from receiving unemployment benefits[cxii] due to their refusing the vaccine. More recently, 26 firehouses in NYC have been closed due to firefighters’ defiance of vaccine mandates.[cxiii] These and similar layoffs and firings across the nation constitute the most vicious attack in living memory upon the working people of this nation.[cxiv] By contrast, the professional managerial class[cxv] appears to be settling, with ominous contentment, into its intended role as administrators of the emergent biofascist order, being joined in this by a shameful preponderance of the culture and education industries, as well as by clergy including the pope.
In addition to the pandemic, the crises we face include the volatile political tensions of our era[cxvi] and the distrust in our elections that, if we are to be honest, both sides of the political divide[cxvii] have (however alternately) shared. It is in this embittered context that Covid-19 has been construed as a weapon in the culture war.
Donald Trump, a rampantly divisive figure whose Operation Warp Speed oversaw development of the Covid-19 injections, is not a viable solution to our problems. That said, in its present trajectory the Biden administration poses a clear and present danger to the nation, including to the First Amendment (through Big Tech’s de facto monopolization and censorship of the national discourse). The administration also threatens medical freedom, military preparedness and morale,[cxviii] as well as the US middle and working classes in particular, who suffered the brunt of lockdowns as they suffer now the brunt of inflation and supply-chain disruptions. None of which are excusable at this point as inevitable effects of the pandemic, and which rather appear as aspects of the plutocratic agenda for the disaster-capitalist[cxix] transformation of the nation into the transhumanist dystopia envisioned by the WEF and its minions.
Beyond this even, the current administration imperils human wellbeing and possibly even survival, considering its doubling down on a dangerously failing and deadly mass vaccination campaign, “boosting” against a strain of the virus already known to resist the vaccine. And this at the risk of ADE driving the emergence of more infectious and/or virulent strains of SARS-CoV-2, all while damaging the immune systems of the vaccinated in a manner whose ramifications have scarcely begun to register. And all at the risk of rendering people dependent upon recurrent vaccinations with novel biological agents that have no long-term safety record and show signs of grave toxicity, news of which is censored in a major media largely controlled by those biological agents’ manufacturers.
Add to all this its unconscionable scapegoating of the unvaccinated, including immiserating as many as it is able without the least genuine scientific justification, and the administration’s mendacity renders it beyond the pale.
I challenge anyone who thinks I exaggerate in any of this to carefully consider the materials in “essential viewing” and “essential reading” (below) before passing judgement. Especially if you are thinking of taking the “booster” or having your children vaccinated. Echoing the warning in the paper quoted above, McCullough emphasizes that the effects of the injections are cumulative, such that the risks of the multiple adverse events associated with the Covid-19 experimental gene therapies increase proportionally with each administration of the “vaccine.”
The biofascist threat
Based on the information I am sharing with you, I concur with ~12,700 doctors[cxx] in regarding the Covid-19 mass vaccination campaign as a crime against humanity. Especially in the wake of the FDA’s insidious decision to approve Emergency Use Authorization of these injections for 5-11 year old children.[cxxi] In a brazen addmission of the potential risks associated with that decision, a voting member of the FDA board stated that “we’re never gonna learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it,”[cxxii] an abject denial of the possibility of clinical trials that in a sane society would have been the obvious course of action. Considering the known dangers and failures of the Covid-19 injections, mass-vaccinating children against a virus that poses an infinitesimal risk to them and which various studies indicate they are unlikely to spread[cxxiii] is frankly evil. Kirsch estimates that, based on current data, we will be killing 100x the children saved by the vaccine while injuring countless more.[cxxiv]
In a recent interview, Vanden Bossche[cxxv] expands upon the threat to children posed by mass vaccination. Vanden Bossche states that public health data in England shows “a tremendous impact of vaccinating children on the infectivity rate.” Elaborating, Vanden Bossche adds that “children, at the beginning of the pandemic, for a year or even longer, especially children, they were completely unaffected. Most of them were not even shedding the virus, let alone getting […] the illness. So why all of the sudden now children are getting infected and […] get ill? So what has changed? I can tell you what has changed. The major change is that we have, by doing the mass vaccination, we have been fostering, we have been promoting the propagation of more infectious variants. So that is to say, of course the infectious variants existed already, the more infectious, but it’s very clear that since we have […] implemented mass vaccination campaigns […] the propagation of more infectious variants has been promoted and has been accelerated.”
Regarding the mass vaccination of children, Vanden Bossche states, “I think it is very, very dangerous what we are doing right now.” He explains that, due to the technology employed in the vaccines, mass-vaccinating children “will no longer allow training of the innate immune system of the child” to effectively fight the virus, training which is “so important because it’s going to protect them at an early age [against] numerous other pathogens.” Moreover, since they will constantly be having to fight off SARS-CoV-2 variants rendered more infectious by vaccine-driven ADE, children (as is happening in England) will “have not enough leeway to fight other pathogens that they would normally easily deal with at that young age.” Vanden Bossche concludes that, due to the vaccines’ interruption of the natural immune system’s ability to learn how to fight the virus: “Very seriously I am convinced […] that immunizing young children […] will lead to a tsunami of autoimmune diseases.”
The deleterious effects which the injections are bound to have on children appear forecast in the damage they are causing to adolescents and young adults. Especially myocarditis, the form of which caused by the injections is far worse, according to McCullough, than the myocarditis caused by Covid-19.[cxxvi] Which may explain the rise in heart disease in soccer players noted by the Berliner Zietung,[cxxvii] and which has spawned investigation of vaccine-induced myocarditis in the US[cxxviii] (again, press insistence that such incidents are “rare” must be weighed against the indications from the professional and peer-reviewed sources we have reviewed that damage from the injections may manifest over the near, mid-, or longer term).
I concur with Agamben that we face in biofascism a threat to humanity on a scale not seen since the specter of Nazism. Yet as Agamben implies, what might be termed a technological metastasis may render the present crisis a still greater threat than civilization has yet faced:
I have tried to describe the form of despotism that we should expect and against which we must not tire of keeping guard. But, if for a moment we leave the realm of current affairs and try to consider things from the point of view of the fate of the human species on Earth, I am reminded of the considerations of a great Dutch scientist, Ludwig Bolk. According to Bolk, the human species is characterized by a progressive inhibition of the natural vital processes of adaptation to the environment, which come to be replaced by a hypertrophic growth of technological apparatuses that adapt the environment to man. When this process surpasses a certain limit, it reaches a point where it becomes counterproductive and transforms into the self-destruction of the species. Phenomena like what we are currently experiencing seem to me to show that this point has been reached and that the medicine that was supposed to cure our ills now risks producing an even greater evil. Against this risk we must resist by any means.
Based on its willingness to roll the dice on a global scale with a completely long-term untested experimental gene therapy, and on the elaborate and all-encompassing nature of the techno-totalitarian surveillance state it has crossed the Rubicon in implementing, the regnant global elite coterie clearly imagines that it has mastered nature, including human nature.[cxxix] I can only regard such a presumption as apocalyptic in its hubris, regardless of its accuracy.
As I see it now, the relevant divide in our nation and world is between liberty and authoritarianism, between the people and a mortally corrupt ruling class[cxxx] (see also) bent on subjecting us to its absolute dominion by way of notoriously corrupt pharmaceutical mega-corporations.[cxxxi] It is between those opposing the loss of freedoms won over centuries at the cost of epic toil and bloodshed, and those who, whether out of ignorance, fear, lassitude, myopia, and/or greed, remain complicit in the scientistic tyranny befalling us.
Having reviewed the matter as carefully as I know how, I know which side I am on. I exhort each of you to an examination of your own conscience in light of the official data, authoritative analyses, and journalistic accounts I am sharing. Considering the rate at which events are unfolding, time is short. The health and freedom of each of us, as of our nation, our loved ones, and our world, hangs in the balance.
A personal note
I realize it will have been some time since many of you have heard from me. I have remained, since 9/11, largely inwardly focused, and occupied with my parapolitical studies and the book I am writing about them. Please know that if you are receiving this from me it is because you remain very much in my regards.
Please do not feel obligated to respond to this letter. I hope you will not be offended by my sending it. I hope too that my apprehension is unwarranted. Yet given what I feel to be the caliber, moral as well as professional, of the aforementioned critics of the Covid-19 pandemic response, and given the scholarly and journalistic reports of the Covid-19 injections’ failures and dangers, and given as well the heightening authoritarianism of our political system and the accompanying deterioration of national civility, I sense our predicament is at least as grave as I have portrayed.
Should you care to respond I would of course welcome it.
Please feel free to forward this letter.
I wish you all well in this fraught and bewildering time, and thank you for your consideration of this message.
11/2/21, Peter Doshi, Editor of The BMJ, at Sen. Ron Johnson’s DC Covid-19 panel:
Children’s Health Defense, compelling (if already dated) video with sources:
Dr. Peter McCullough:
A major biological catastrophe:
On effectiveness of early treatment protocols:
Dr. Ryan Cole:
Vax weakens immune system:
Rare cancers appearing in vaxxed population:
RFK Jr on Fauci:
Fauci & Gates as longtime intel assets:
Geert Vanden Bossche and Robert Malone (with commentary by Del Bigtree of The Highwire):
October 2021, Doctors’ Roundtable:
Nov 2, 2021, Attorney Aaron Siri re vaccine injuries and punitive treatment of physicians:
“Public health or private wealth? How digital vaccine passports pave the way for unprecedented surveillance capitalism”:
Regulatory capture of FDA:
Geert Vanden Bossche, the insanity of vaxxing children:
Paper, 57 medical authorities question mass-vax safety:
US elite plans as signaled by Biden administration:
COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey, by Peter R Breggin MD & Ginger Ross Breggin, Lake Edge Press, 2021
(forthcoming Nov. 16) The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the War on Democracy and Public Health, by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Childrens Health Defense, 2021
Selected supplementary material:
Fully vaxxed are superspreaders:
Fauci’s Moderna needed a “Hail Mary”:
Paper indicating vax not able to keep up with virus mutation rate:
50 med journal sources supporting vax hesitancy:
Article, 15 studies natural immunity superior to vax:
FDA approval bait-and-switch:
FDA “slide 16” demonstrating government foreknowledge of host of C-19 vaccine hazards:
See also (for update):
See these linked to in prior thread: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28441058/
See also endnote xxxviii.
Also, for documentation of spike protein diffusion throughout body, see: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075
For vaccine deaths/injuries in the European context in particular, see: https://int.artloft.co/covid-vaccines-more-than-26000-deaths-and-almost-2-5-million-injuries/
And (in relation to prior entry): https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland
…for criticism of positive findings re vaccine in prior listed study, see: https://dailysceptic.org/2021/10/28/new-lancet-study-from-sweden-shows-vaccine-effectiveness-against-infection-dropping-to-zero-and-sharp-decline-against-severe-disease-as-well/
See also endnote xii.
For context, see: https://time.com/5888024/50-trillion-income-inequality-america/
And: Chapter 3, pp. 41-60, COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey, by Peter R Breggin MD & Ginger Ross Breggin
[cxxiv] (see slide show associated link) https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/10/27/for-the-public-record-critical-questions-fda-must-address-about-vaccine-safety/